Are
you Spiritual but not Religious? Here’s why you are an idiot . . .
Why “Religion” is a good
word that we need to defend.
It is “chic” and, I would add, a “cliche” to hear many people say
today, “I am
spiritual but not religious.” There is a kind of self-congratulatory tone that often goes
with this self description as well, and certainly a lot of cultural approval in
the secular West for such dissociative talk.
There is even some acceptance of this notion among more
theologically conservative evangelicals who, on account of their “low
ecclesiology” also favor a kind decentralized and highly personal notion of
faith, and entertain a kind of cynicism to “organized religion.”
The Washington Post had a column on the “spiritual but not
religious” phenomenon this past Saturday by Michelle Boorstein entitled
simply Religion.
I would like to present a few excerpts and then discuss why I think we should
not only retain the words “religion” and “religious,” but also be suitably
proud of them.
First, a few excerpts from the article, along with a few very
brief comment by me in plain red text. The full article is HERE.
We’re no longer “religious.” We’re “holy.” We’re “faithful.” We’re
“spiritual.”….Diana Butler Bass, author of last year’s “Christianity After
Religion,” who says the word “religion” is laden with negative, hurtful and
political baggage. (Perhaps, but so is everything: Government, schools, medicine,
science, etc. It would seem this is not unique to “religion” but is the human
condition).
The 20 percent of Americans who now call themselves
unaffiliated with any religious group see religion as much too focused on
rules….(but
rules and accepted practices are part of life. I wonder if these same Americans
would be so pleased if their dentist or doctor threw rules, protocol or
accepted medical practice to the winds? There is a place for “rules” that
enshrine the collective wisdom of the ages!)
On the other side are people such as super-popular shock pastor
and writer Mark Driscoll, an evangelical conservative whose sermons have such
titles as “Why I hate religion.” He preaches that the institutional church has
wrongly let people feel good about themselves for their actions (such as going
to worship services) instead of what they believe (which should be the Bible’s
literal truth, in his view)….(Yes, here is the “dark side” of evangelical Christianity and
its “americaninst” designer-church mentality. At the end of the day, its
extreme form is little different from any other modern deconstructionist,
iconoclastic, existentialist, and nihilistic movement. The thinking is “away
with anything I don’t like, away with anything that limits me in any way with
“rules” that look to balance my little vision with the bigger picture. Away
with anything I don’t like or think limits me from being…me”).
Polling shows that young Americans are considerably less apt to
have religious affiliations than earlier generations were at the same
age. (OK, but polls reflect what is, not what ought to be, or what is
correct). They
attend religious services less often, and fewer of them say religion is
important in their lives. (OK, we have work to do! But that doesn’t make us wrong). But more than nine
in 10 people believe in God, according to a recent Gallup poll, a statistic
unchanged for decades….(but at some point we must ask if this means anything at all. It is
good that they are not outright atheists, but sometimes indifference is a worse
enemy than hatred). People are walking away from institutional expressions of
church. They’re trying to renegotiate man’s relationship to God,” said David
Kinnaman, president of the Barna Group, a major research firm on religion….Now
more and more people look to their conscience, however it’s formed, to decide
for themselves.” (more on this attitude below). Although some reject
the word “religion,” others simply ignore it.
Read the entire article @ http://blog.adw.org/2013/07/why-religion-is-a-good-word-that-we-need-to-defend/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.