Did the pope really say it’s OK to be Gay? Here's what Jimmy Akin says . .
7 things you
need to know about what Pope Francis said about gays
The press is buzzing right now with claims that Pope Francis has
taken a sharply different line than his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, on the
subject of homosexuality.
Some are suggesting that the new pope has announced that "gay
is okay."
What did Pope Francis really say, and how unusual is it?
Here are 7 things to know and share . . .
1) Where did Pope Francis make these remarks?
He made them during an 80-minute interview with reporters aboard
the plane returning from World Youth Day in Brazil.
2) What was he asked that led to the remarks?
We may not know exactly what the question was until a transcript
is released, but apparently, he was asked about the reputed "gay
lobby" at the Vatican.
3) What exactly did he say?
According to the best current accounts, he said:
There's a lot of talk
about the gay lobby, but I've never seen it on the Vatican ID card.
When I meet a gay person,
I have to distinguish between their being gay and being part of a lobby. If
they accept the Lord and have goodwill, who am I to judge them? They shouldn't
be marginalized. The tendency [i.e., same-sex attraction] is not the problem
... they're our brothers.
4) What does this mean?
The first part of the statement seems to downplay the who
"gay lobby" issue. He's not denying that there is one there, but he's
suggesting that the talk is somewhat overblown.
He then explains his approach to dealing with gay people: He
distinguishes between their "being gay" and "being part of a
lobby."
What he means by "being gay" is something he further
unpacks.
In ordinary parlance, "being gay" can mean anything from
having same-sex attraction to leading an active "gay lifestyle" to
endorsing and advocating a pro-homosexual ideology.
The last of these would be functioning as a member of a lobby, and
he indicates that this is not what he is talking about.
He then describes those he is talking about as people who "accept the Lord and have goodwill."
He then seems to further clarify who he is talking about by saying
that "The tendency [i.e., same-sex attraction] is not the problem ...
they're our brothers."
Taking his statements together, what emerges is a portrait of
individuals who have same-sex attraction but who nevertheless accept the Lord
and have goodwill, as opposed to working to advance a pro-homosexual ideology.
This would definitely include people with same-sex attraction who
strive to live chastely (even if they sometimes fail).
It also, possibly, could include individuals who are not living
chastely but who are not actively lobbying a homosexual agenda. It would be
nice if he'd said a little more to clarify the point further.
5) What does he say about people in this category?
He says that he does not think he is in a position to judge them
and that they should not be marginalized.
He also says that the mere tendency (same-sex attraction) "is
not the problem," and that "they're our brothers."
6) How new is this?
Not very.
Disclaiming a right to "judge" others is something that
goes back to Jesus. It does not mean a failure to recognize the moral character
of others' actions, however.
One can form a moral appraisal that what someone else is doing is
wrong (Jesus obviously does not forbid that) without having or showing malice
toward them.
The statement that same-sex attraction "is not the
problem," when understood correctly, is also nothing new. "The
problem," as Pope Francis seems to here be understanding it, is going
beyond merely having a sinful tendency--a temptation to which one is subject.
Obviously, temptations are problem, but if we resist temptation we
do not sin. "The problem," on this understanding, is giving into the
temptation and sinning or--worse--building an ideology around the sin and
trying to advocate the sin.
Finally, the statement that "they're our brothers" is also
no novelty. Christians, like everyone, have struggled with every sort of
temptation all through history.
Same-sex attraction is just one temptation among numerous others,
and the fact that a person suffers from this temptation no more deprives him of
the status of being a brother in Christ than any other temptation does.
7) How different is any of this compared to Pope Benedict?
Pope Francis did not mention that document or its policy and so
has done nothing different than Benedict there.
Neither are any of Francis's remarks contrary to the approach
Benedict took during his pontificate.
So, as usual, the press is painting a false picture by contrasting
the "good" Francis and the "bad" Benedict.