As we near All Hallows Eve, aka Halloween, we fired some questions
at the walking encyclopedia that is Father Steve Grunow, and he responded with
everything you ever wanted to know about Halloween and its deeply Catholic
roots.
QUESTION: I always figured that Halloween had pagan roots, but
you are telling me they are Catholic. Huh? How so?
Fr. Steve: The
origin and traditional customs associated with Halloween require no other
explanation than that they are examples of the kinds of festivity that served
as a means of celebrating the various holy days of the Catholic Liturgical
Year. This includes everything from masquerades, feasting, and the
associations of a given day of the year with supernatural or spiritual truths.
I would draw a distinction between the violent, macabre imagery
that characterizes the modern appropriation of Halloween as a kind of secular
celebration and the more traditional customs that are characteristic of a
Catholic cultural ethos. The descent of Halloween into the madness of an
annual fright fest is a relatively recent development, but the true substance
of Halloween belongs to the Church. Halloween (or “All Hallows Eve”) is
the festive precursor to the celebration of the Church’s public commemoration
of All Saints Day.
There has been an appropriation of the festivities of Halloween
by modern pagans, but please understand that modern paganism is precisely
modern and should be distinguished from the cults of ancient
religions. The origins and practices of the modern paganism do not extend
farther back than the late nineteenth century. Also, remember, the term “pagan”
is a slippery one. What does it mean? The worship of the gods and
goddesses from long ago? Those cults have long since passed away with the
cultural matrix that once supported the world views that were the conditions
for their possibility. You can’t just reinvent those cults without the
culture that supported them.
The paganism that exists today is a romantic and very selective
attempt at a re-appropriation of an ancient religious ethos, but it isn’t and
cannot be the same thing that paganism was in its original cultural
expressions. I think that the practitioners need to justify their beliefs
by insisting on an association with what they are doing and ancient forms and
styles of worship. This gives the impression that the modern pagan élan
has more gravitas (especially in relation to Christianity) but it doesn’t make
it the same thing as the ancient cults. The association that modern
paganism makes between itself and the forms and styles of ancient culture is
more about desire than it is about reality.
I think that the association of Halloween with paganism has much
more to do with the Protestant Reformation than anything else. The Protestant
reformers were concerned about the practices of medieval Christianity that to
them seemed contrary to what they believed the Church should be. They knew that
these practices had clear precedents in the history of the Church, but insisted
that they represented a corruption of the original form of Christianity that
had become degraded over time. The degradation was explained as a regression
into cultural forms that the Protestants described as pagan.
I realize popular religiosity is a complex phenomenon and the
Church in Europe did intentionally assimilate many cultural practices that were
more ancient than it’s own practices, but it did so selectively and with a keen
sense of discernment. The end result was not simply that a veneer of
Christianity was placed on top of an ancient pagan ethos, but that a new
cultural matrix was created, one that was Christian to its core. It is a
gross mischaracterization and oversimplification to assert that you can just
scratch the surface of medieval Christianity and what rises up is paganism.
And yet this perception endures in contemporary
culture. You see it, for example, in works of fiction like Marion Zimmer
Bradley’s The Mists of Avalon, which
appropriates ideas from a lot of spurious, pseudo scholarship that permeated
British intellectual culture throughout the nineteenth and early twentieth
century. Unfortunately, this has become a standard and widely accepted
narrative of how Europe became Christian. It is a modern myth born of the
prejudices and propaganda of the Protestant reformation that mutated into the
secular critique of Catholicism. As an ideological construct it represents
the simultaneous fascination and aversion to Medieval culture in general and
Catholicism in particular. The reality is far more complex and
interesting.
Protestantism was and is proposing what its adherents believe to
be an alternative to Catholicism. This means that Protestantism will
distinguish itself from the forms and styles of religious life that preceded
their own culture and that this culture will be presented as a purified form of
Christian faith and practice. One argument that is advanced to justify
Protestant distinctiveness is that the beliefs and practices of the Catholic
Church are pagan.
Placing all this in an American cultural context, the United
States set its cultural roots in forms of Protestantism that were keenly aware
of the distinction between themselves and a Catholic Europe that they had
rejected and whose influence they had hoped to leave behind. Remember, the
Puritans left Protestant England for the New World because England wasn’t
Protestant enough! The Puritans detested the residual forms of Catholicism
that they believed remained in the state church of England.
The arrival of Catholic immigrants to the shores of Protestant
America was a source of great cultural consternation. The public festivals
of the Catholic Faith were characterized as a corrupting and dangerous form of
paganism. Halloween with all its carousing and shenanigans was especially
problematic, as it represented the incursion of a specifically Catholic
cultural form into a public life that was supposed to be Protestant. Everything
associated with these Catholic festivities was caricatured as pagan and
the association stuck with even the Catholics internalizing the critique and
believing that their own customs were holdovers from paganism.
As a result, the distinctly Catholic nature of Halloween became
more and more muted and it was Catholics pulling back from their own festival
that gave rise to the contemporary version of Halloween. The goulish
version of the festival that we have today is in many respects a result of
Catholic accommodation to a Protestant culture. And in a another strange
twist in the history of Halloween, most everything that the devout Protestant
detests about Halloween have become all the more pronounced as a result of
their protests.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.