Historical revisionism has been a favorite pastime of liberals.
They have accused religious folks of believing in a flat earth (false) until
Columbus confounded the religious leaders of his day (false), that religion has
been at war with science (false), and that the Inquisition was one of the
bloodiest assaults on humanity in the name of God (false).
The sad fact is, there are some Christians who parrot the
revisionist history of liberals and pass it off as historical gospel.
Revisionist historiography cuts both ways.
The following is from the people who operate the anti-Catholic
Worldview Weekend:
Topic: The Catholic inquisition killed over 50 million Christians,
and in this program Brannon [Howse] gives just some of the facts to document
this figure. Topic: Do today's neo-evangelicals and religious right that think
they are so brave in exposing the murderous history of Islam also have the
courage of their convictions to expose the murderous history of the Church of
Rome and the 50 million killed by the Papacy through the inquisition?”
So who’s right? To be honest, I have never done a thorough study
of the history of Inquisition, but others have. The following comes from Rodney
Stark’s book The Triumph of Christianity. It’s a real eye opener, as is
his book For the Glory of God:
The standard account of the Spanish Inquisition was invented and spread by
English and Dutch propagandists in the sixteenth century during their wars with
Spain and repeated ever after by malicious or misled historians eager to
sustain “an image of Spain as a nation of fanatical bigots.” This image of
Spain is now referred to by fair-minded historians as the “Black Legend.”.
. (335-336)
Astonishing as it may seem, the new historians of the Inquisition have revealed
that, in contrast with the secular courts all across Europe, the Spanish
Inquisition was a consistent force for justice, restraint, due process, and
enlightenment. (337)
The fact is that during the entire period 1480 through 1700, only about ten
deaths per year were meted out by the Inquisition all across Spain – and
usually to repeat offenders! By modern Western standards, of course, even ten
executions a year for various acts of religious nonconformity seem a dreadful
excess. (338)
Every court in Europe used torture, but the Inquisition did so far less
than other courts. (339)
“But even so, torture was rarely used, perhaps because the “inquisitors
themselves were skeptical of the efficacy and validity of torture as a method
of conviction.” (339)
Contrary to the standard myth, the Inquisition made little use of the stake,
seldom tortured anyone, and maintained unusually decent prisons. (339)
[T]he Inquisition used its power and influence to suppress witch-hunting by
local mobs or secular authorities. (343) (Stark relates a fascinating story
about how the Inquisition intervened in a particular case.)
Stark does not sugarcoat history. He tells both sides of the
story. Secular historians seem only to cite examples that make religion look
bad. Consider this:
“Even leading antireligious voices of the day supported the
persecution of witches. Thomas Hobbes (1599-1679), the famous English
philosopher and outspoken atheist who, in his very influential book Leviathan,
dismissed all religion as ‘credulity,’ ‘ignorance,’ and ‘lies’ and Gods as but
‘creatures of fancy,’ also wrote in that same book, ‘[A]s for witches . . .
they are justly punished.’
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.