By Charles Krauthammer
. . . “Obama
declared himself offended by the suggestion that anyone in his administration,
including the U.N. ambassador, would “mislead” the country on Libya.
This bluster —
unchallenged by Romney — helped Obama slither out of the Libya question
unscathed. Unfortunately for Obama, there is one more debate — next week,
entirely on foreign policy. The burning issue will be Libya and the scandalous
parade of fictions told by this administration to explain away the debacle . .
.
Romney will be ready Monday.
You are offended by this accusation, Mr.
President? The country is offended that your press secretary, your U.N.
ambassador and you yourself have repeatedly misled the nation about the origin
and nature of the Benghazi attack.
The problem wasn’t the video, the problem
was policies for which you say you now accept responsibility. Then accept it,
Mr. President. You were asked in the last debate why more security was denied
our people in Libya despite the fact that they begged for
it. You never answered that question, Mr. President. Or will you blame your
secretary of state?
Esprit d’escalier (“wit of the
staircase”) is the French term for the devastating riposte that one should have
given at dinner but comes up with only on the way out at the bottom of the
staircase. It’s Romney’s fortune that he’s invited to one more dinner. If he
gets it right this time, Obama’s narrow victory in debate No. 2, salvaged by
the mock umbrage that anyone could accuse him of misleading, will cost him
dearly.
It was a huge gaffe. It is indelibly on the record. It
will prove a very expensive expedient.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.