The Disastrous Clinton Post-Presidency
The news today about the Clintons all fleshes out, in one way or another,
their lack of interest in policing serious conflict-of-interest problems that
arise in their overlapping roles:
- The New York Times has a report about the
State Department’s decision to approve the sale of Uranium mines to a
Russian company that donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Global
Initiative, and that a Russian investment bank promoting the deal paid
Bill $500,000 for a speech in Moscow.
- The Washington Post reports that Bill
Clinton has received $26 million in speaking fees from entities that also
donated to the Clinton Global Initiative.
- The Washington Examiner reports, “Twenty-two
of the 37 corporations nominated for a prestigious State
Department award — and six of the eight ultimate winners — while Hillary
Clinton was Secretary of State were also donors to the Clinton family
foundation.”
- And Reuters reports, “Hillary Clinton's family's
charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns after a Reuters
review found errors in how they reported donations from governments, and
said they may audit other Clinton Foundation returns in case of other
errors.”
The Clinton campaign is batting down the darkest and most conspiratorial
interpretation of these stories, and where this all leads remains to be seen.
But the most positive interpretation is not exactly good. . .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.