What will
happen after the US Supreme Court unconstitutionally imposes same-sex
“marriage” on every state? Look to Canada to see what has happened
there with new laws and regulations that limit free speech, limit parental
rights, limit freedom of religion, and punish those who fail to conform.
The
legalization of same-sex “marriage” does not bring with it the innocent blood
which cries to heaven, though it is perhaps the single most audacious social
engineering initiative in American history. But the way in which it has been
imposed in state after state, as courts have seen fit to ignore ballot
initiatives, sets the stage for a United States Supreme Court ruling on par
with Roe vs. Wade. The Supreme Court has announced
it will rule on same-sex “marriage” in this sitting—exactly ten years after
Canada legalized same-sex “marriage.” It is important for Americans to look
at what has happened in Canada.
On July 20, 2005, Canada became
the fourth country in the world to legalize same-sex “marriage.” On that day
the sun rose as it always does, people went to work, daily Mass was celebrated
in Catholic Churches and daily life continued to unfold as it normally does. In
the days and months following there was no massive spike in the numbers of
same-sex couples getting “married” (it had already been legal in 8 of 10
provinces since 2003), the speculated upon possibility of same-sex “marriage”
tourism from the United States never really materialized and the Canadian flag
was not changed from the maple leaf to the LGBT rainbow. But something very
significant happened with the legalization of marriage in Canada and it wasn’t
about the freedom of gay people to marry, and it wasn’t really about marriage.
July 20,
2005 marked a very significant step towards totalitarianism in Canada.
Free
speech, the rights of parents, the right to preach and practise one’s religion
and the worn and tattered fibers of normative decency were all deeply damaged.
With the legalization of same-sex “marriage” what had been aberrant only a few
years earlier became entrenched as a legal right, and what had been a normal
and natural view of sexuality had been reduced to the retrograde thinking of
hate crime dinosaurs.
Terrence
Prendergast is the Catholic archbishop of Ottawa. Speaking at St. Thomas
University in Minnesota in 2012, he outlined the consequences of same-sex
“marriage” in Canada. His list included: restrictions on freedoms, forced
sex education, sexually confused children, sexual experimentation among
children, muzzling and debilitating the Church, more births out of wedlock,
more in-vitro fertilizations, more abortions, more poverty, more misery, more
disease, more addictions and higher health care costs.
Calgary
bishop Frederick Henry was called before a Human Rights Commission Tribunal in
2005 for writing a letter defining Catholic teaching on same-sex “marriage.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.