"In 1996 Congress passed the
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) by huge bipartisan votes -- 342 to 67 in the
House and 85 to 14 in the Senate. President Bill Clinton signed the measure
into law. Now, the Obama administration says DOMA, which permits states
to refuse to recognize gay marriages from other states and also creates a
federal definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman, is
unconstitutional.
... 'I'm confident that the
Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step
of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically
elected Congress,' Obama said Monday about the arguments over Obamacare before
the nation's highest court. The danger presented in the health care case, the
president continued, is that 'an unelected group of people would somehow
overturn a duly constituted and passed law.'
... If the president was so
concerned about a court overturning a duly constituted law passed by a
democratically elected Congress, why was he urging a small group of unelected judges
to strike down DOMA, a measure that won passage by a far greater margin than
Obamacare? The answer is, of course, that the administration is making a
political argument for its positions, not a legal one.
... [T]he timing of the arguments
over Obamacare and DOMA has revealed the flexibility of the administration's
arguments over constitutionality. And the flap over Obama's remarks is just a
preview of what is coming when the court issues its decision on Obamacare this
June."
--columnist Byron York
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.