The questions in the following article lead me to wonder how a person on a Fulbright Scholarship as a foreign student became a millionaire on a $12,000/year job as a community organizer???????
This
election has me very worried. So many things to consider. McCain was a Washington insider and we dont need any more of
them. I have changed my mind three times, since then. I watch all
the news channels, jumping from one to another. I must say this drives my
husband crazy. But, I feel if you view CNN, and Fox News, you might get
some middle ground to work with. I started thinking "where does all
the money come from for President Obama"? I have four daughters who
went to College, and we were middle class, and money was tight. We
(including my girls) worked hard and there were lots of student loans. I
started looking into Obama's history for my own peace of mind.
Around 1979 Obama started college at
Occidental in California . He is very open about his two years at
Occidental, he tried all kinds of drugs and was wasting his time but, even
though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself to his studies.
"Barry" (that was the name he used all his life) during this time had
two roommates, Muhammad Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan
. During the summer of 1981, after his second year in college, he made a
"round the world" trip. Stopping to see his mother in Indonesia
, next Hyderabad in India , three weeks in Karachi , Pakistan where he stayed
with his roommate's family, then off to Africa to visit his father's family.
My question - Where did he get the
money for this trip? Nether I, nor any one of my children would have had
money for a trip like this when they were in college. When he came back
he started school at Columbia University in New York . It is at this time
he wants everyone to call him Barack - not Barry. Do you know what the
tuition is at Columbia ? It's not cheap to say the least. My girls
asked me; where did he get money for tuition? Student Loans? Maybe
its none of my business?
After Columbia , he went to Chicago
to work as a Community Organizer for $12,000. a year. Why Chicago ?
Why not New York ? He was already living in New York . By
"chance" he met Antoin "Tony" Rezko, born in Aleppo Syria ,
and a real estate developer in Chicago . Rezko has been convicted of
fraud and bribery several times in the past and in 2011. Rezko, was named
"Entrepreneur of the Decade" by the Arab-American Business and
Professional Association". About two years later, Obama entered
Harvard Law School . Do you have any idea what tuition is for Harvard Law
School ? Where did he get the money for Law School ? More student
loans? His family has no money thats for sure.
After Law school, he went back to
Chicago . Rezko offered him a job, which he turned down. But, he
did take a job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland. Guess what I
discovered? They represented "Rezar" which is Rezko's
firm. Rezko was one of Obama's first major financial contributors when he
ran for office in Chicago . In 2003, Rezko threw an early fundraiser for
Obama which Chicago Tribune reporter David Mendelland claims was instrumental
in providing Obama with "seed money" for his U.S. Senate race.
In 2005, Obama purchased a new home
in Kenwoood District of Chicago for $1.65 million (less than asking
price). With ALL those Student Loans - Where did he get the money for
this property? On the same day Rezko's wife, Rita, purchased the
adjoining empty lot for full price. The London Times reported that Nadhmi
Auchi, an Iraqi-born Billionaire loaned Rezko $3.5 million three weeks before
Obama's new home was purchased. Obama met Nadhmi Auchi many times with
Rezko.
Now, we have Obama running for
President. Valerie Jarrett, was Michele Obama's boss. She is now
Obama's chief advisor and he does not make any major decisions without talking
to her first. Where was Jarrett born? Ready for this? Shiraz
, Iran ! Am I going nuts or is there a pattern here?
On May 10, 2008, The Times reported,
Robert Malley advisor to Obama was "sacked" after the press found out
he was having regular contacts with "Hamas", which controls Gaza and
is connected with Iran . This past week, buried in the back part of the
papers, Iraqi newspapers reported that during Obama's visit to Iraq , he asked
their leaders to do nothing about the war until after he is elected, and he
will "Take care of things". What the heck does that mean?
Oh, and by the way, remember the
college roommates that were born in Pakistan ? They are in charge of all
those "small" Internet campaign contribution for Obama. Where
is that money coming from? The poor and middle class in this
country? Or could it be from the Middle East ?
And the final bit of news. On
September 7, 2009, The Washington Times posted a verbal slip that was made on
"This Week" with George Stephanopoulos. Obama on talking about
his religion said, "My Muslim faith". When questioned, "he
make a mistake". Some mistake huh?
All of the above information I got
on line. If you would like to check it - Wikipedia, encyclopedia, Barack
Obama; Tony Rezko; Valerie Jarrett: Daily Times - Obama visited Pakistan in
1981; The Washington Times - September 7, 2008; The Times May 10, 2008.
Now the BIG question - If I found
out all this information on my own, Why haven't all of our
"intelligent" members of the press been reporting this? Is this
a Kettle of Fish??
As Arseno Hall would
say.----"HUMMMMMMM! Does something stink or is it my imagination?"
These are legitimate questions for our president.
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Obama's Threats
Did
you notice who Obama threatened when he wasn't getting his way on raising the
debt ceiling?
He threatened to not pay:
Social Security Retirees, Military Retirees, Social Security disability and Federal Retirees.
Now.. Let this sink in really good -
He did not threaten to stop payments to illegal aliens, he did not threaten to take frivolous benefits such as Internet access away from violent inmates.
He did not offer to fire some of the thousands of unnecessary federal employees that he hired.
He did not offer to cut down on his or his wife's frivolous gallivanting around.They went to Hawaii for 17 days over Christmas 2011.
He did not threaten to not pay the senators and representatives or any of their staff.
He did not threaten to take benefits away from welfare recipients.
He did not threaten the food stamp programs.
He did not threaten to not pay foreign aid.
He did not threaten to cut back on anything that involves his base voters.
The list could go on and on.. He is in full political re-election mode!
* Why are we allowing this person to destroy this wonderful country with his selfishness and his lies?
* His type of change is killing our country. He needs to be stopped and only our Votes can stop him.
* Do not forget about his tactics when it's election time. Vote Obama OUT of the Presidency in 2012.
LET'S MAKE 2012 - THE END OF AN ERROR!
"Democracy... Is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty ... Is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin
AMERICA ..... HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE
He threatened to not pay:
Social Security Retirees, Military Retirees, Social Security disability and Federal Retirees.
Now.. Let this sink in really good -
He did not threaten to stop payments to illegal aliens, he did not threaten to take frivolous benefits such as Internet access away from violent inmates.
He did not offer to fire some of the thousands of unnecessary federal employees that he hired.
He did not offer to cut down on his or his wife's frivolous gallivanting around.They went to Hawaii for 17 days over Christmas 2011.
He did not threaten to not pay the senators and representatives or any of their staff.
He did not threaten to take benefits away from welfare recipients.
He did not threaten the food stamp programs.
He did not threaten to not pay foreign aid.
He did not threaten to cut back on anything that involves his base voters.
The list could go on and on.. He is in full political re-election mode!
* Why are we allowing this person to destroy this wonderful country with his selfishness and his lies?
* His type of change is killing our country. He needs to be stopped and only our Votes can stop him.
* Do not forget about his tactics when it's election time. Vote Obama OUT of the Presidency in 2012.
LET'S MAKE 2012 - THE END OF AN ERROR!
"Democracy... Is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty ... Is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin
AMERICA ..... HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE
Obama May Be In Deep Trouble
Obama
May Be In Deep Trouble...with Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme
Court.
Anthony G. Martin - North St. Paul News
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the
federal government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme
Court may be inevitable.
Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics
have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have
complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run
headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal
government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the
Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early
in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First
Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political
ads during the time of an election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not
sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who
publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not
true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.
As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship
between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal
government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he
blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of
every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood
for over 200 years.
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as
his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh,
Beck, Hannity, and so on. And it is no accident that the one
swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently
that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'
Apparently, the Court has had enough. The Roberts Court has signaled,
in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the
issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A
ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could
potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long
overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the
Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing
citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as
states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the
intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits the FEDERAL
government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not
everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase
car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the
ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly
accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that
raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii .
And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.
In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical
hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on
tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies. This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE ON YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS LIST!!!
In passing this on it is no wonder Americans of every race and political persuasion are disgusted with our Federal Government, it is not hard to understand the mistrust and the disgust. Obama and his administration should be impeached and the quicker the better. Obama only knows the blame game, now it is the Tea Party that caused him to spend our country into debt so deep it may never recover. He is a President that had a super majority in both houses until last November. And because of that he jammed pork barrel projects and spending of every kind of an entitlement bill one can't imagine along with Obama Care down our throats with spending that is unattainable.
He is borrowing 42 cents on every dollar we owe and spend, wake up
America we have become a third world communist country.
HOW DO YOU LIKE HIS CHANGE NOW??
Anthony G. Martin - North St. Paul News
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the
federal government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme
Court may be inevitable.
Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics
have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have
complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run
headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal
government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the
Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early
in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First
Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political
ads during the time of an election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not
sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who
publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not
true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.
As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship
between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal
government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he
blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of
every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood
for over 200 years.
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as
his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh,
Beck, Hannity, and so on. And it is no accident that the one
swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently
that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'
Apparently, the Court has had enough. The Roberts Court has signaled,
in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the
issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A
ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could
potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long
overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the
Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing
citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as
states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the
intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits the FEDERAL
government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not
everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase
car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the
ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly
accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that
raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii .
And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.
In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical
hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on
tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies. This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE ON YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS LIST!!!
In passing this on it is no wonder Americans of every race and political persuasion are disgusted with our Federal Government, it is not hard to understand the mistrust and the disgust. Obama and his administration should be impeached and the quicker the better. Obama only knows the blame game, now it is the Tea Party that caused him to spend our country into debt so deep it may never recover. He is a President that had a super majority in both houses until last November. And because of that he jammed pork barrel projects and spending of every kind of an entitlement bill one can't imagine along with Obama Care down our throats with spending that is unattainable.
He is borrowing 42 cents on every dollar we owe and spend, wake up
America we have become a third world communist country.
HOW DO YOU LIKE HIS CHANGE NOW??
Unusual Obituary
Obituary in The Denver Post reads:
"A Celebration of the life of Michael "Flathead" Blanchard will be held on April 14, 3 p.m. 8160 Rosemary St, Commerce City. Weary of reading obituaries noting someone's courageous battle with death, Mike wanted it known that he died as a result of being stubborn, refusing to follow doctors' orders and raising hell for more than six decades. He enjoyed booze, guns, cars and younger women until the day he died.
"Mike was born July 1944 in Colorado to Clyde and Ethel Blanchard. A community activist, he is noted for saving the Dr. Justina Ford house from demolition and defending those who could not defend themselves. He was a Republican delegate, life member of the NRA, founder and President of the Dead Cats MC. He loved music.
"A Celebration of the life of Michael "Flathead" Blanchard will be held on April 14, 3 p.m. 8160 Rosemary St, Commerce City. Weary of reading obituaries noting someone's courageous battle with death, Mike wanted it known that he died as a result of being stubborn, refusing to follow doctors' orders and raising hell for more than six decades. He enjoyed booze, guns, cars and younger women until the day he died.
"Mike was born July 1944 in Colorado to Clyde and Ethel Blanchard. A community activist, he is noted for saving the Dr. Justina Ford house from demolition and defending those who could not defend themselves. He was a Republican delegate, life member of the NRA, founder and President of the Dead Cats MC. He loved music.
"Mike was preceded in
death by Clyde and Ethel Blanchard, survived by his beloved sons Mike and
Chopper, former wife Jane Transue, brother Stephen Blanchard (Susan), Uncle Don
and Aunt Cynthia Blanchard(his favorite); Uncle Dill and Aunt Dot, cousins and
nephews, Baba Yaga can kiss his butt. So many of his childhood friends that weren't
killed in Vietnam went on to become criminals, prostitutes and/or Democrats. He
asks that you stop by and re-tell the stories he can no longer tell. As the
Celebration will contain Adult material we respectfully ask that no children
under 18 attend."
Eerie Parallels of Presidents Lincoln and Obama
1. Lincoln placed his hand on the Bible for his inauguration. Obama used the
same Bible.
2. Lincoln came from Illinois. Obama comes from Illinois.
3. Lincoln served in the Illinois Legislature. Obama served in the Illinois Legislature.
4. Lincoln had very little experience before becoming President. Obama had very little experience before becoming President.
5. Lincoln rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration. Obama rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration.
6. Lincoln was a skinny lawyer. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
7. Lincoln was a Republican. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
8. Lincoln was in the United States military. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
9. Lincoln believed in everyone carrying their own weight. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
10. Lincoln did not waste taxpayers' money on personal enjoyments. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
11. Lincoln was highly respected. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
12. Lincoln was born in the United States. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
13. Lincoln was honest, so honest he was called Honest Abe. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
14. Lincoln saved the United States. Obama is a skinny lawyer .
2. Lincoln came from Illinois. Obama comes from Illinois.
3. Lincoln served in the Illinois Legislature. Obama served in the Illinois Legislature.
4. Lincoln had very little experience before becoming President. Obama had very little experience before becoming President.
5. Lincoln rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration. Obama rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration.
6. Lincoln was a skinny lawyer. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
7. Lincoln was a Republican. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
8. Lincoln was in the United States military. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
9. Lincoln believed in everyone carrying their own weight. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
10. Lincoln did not waste taxpayers' money on personal enjoyments. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
11. Lincoln was highly respected. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
12. Lincoln was born in the United States. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
13. Lincoln was honest, so honest he was called Honest Abe. Obama is a skinny lawyer.
14. Lincoln saved the United States. Obama is a skinny lawyer .
The Truth about the Crusades
Popular
Belief: The Crusades were attempts by Catholic
armies to convert pagans, Jews, and Muslims to Christianity or kill them and
take over their lands.
- President Clinton’s ignorant and false statement about the Crusades
- The false history applying moral equivalent to Christians and Muslims during the Crusades
- Revisionist history portraying Christians as aggressors against innocent Muslims
- Eight crusades over 200 years which started in response to the Muslim conquest of Christian Jerusalem
- Forced conversions to Islam by Muslims; while such conversions are against Catholic teaching and history
- Sir Walter Scott’s book “The Talisman” which gave a false history of the Crusades
- Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany’s fascination with Scott’s book and his false belief in mass-murderer Saladdin as a moderate Muslim
- Egypt as a strong Coptic Christian nation with a Jewish minority that was converted to Islam by force
- Joseph François Michaud’s 6-volume false history of the Crusades and his imperialist agenda
- How Muslims changed their view of the Crusades from great Islamic victories into a false story of poor victims of evil Christian aggression
- Just War Doctrine that allows Christians to defend themselves against the onslaught of Islamic warriors
- Why today’s Christians should be proud of their Crusader forefathers’ defense of their religious beliefs
The Truth: Contrary to popular belief, the Crusades were not
a campaign to spread faith by the sword, but a defense of Christians and their holy
places against Muslim
aggression as well as an answer to desperate pleas from Christians under
assault in their homelands as Islam spread by the sword out of Saudi Arabia.
This
video explains:
-
False
belief by Christians that the Crusades were a shameful period of their history- President Clinton’s ignorant and false statement about the Crusades
- The false history applying moral equivalent to Christians and Muslims during the Crusades
- Revisionist history portraying Christians as aggressors against innocent Muslims
- Eight crusades over 200 years which started in response to the Muslim conquest of Christian Jerusalem
- Forced conversions to Islam by Muslims; while such conversions are against Catholic teaching and history
- Sir Walter Scott’s book “The Talisman” which gave a false history of the Crusades
- Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany’s fascination with Scott’s book and his false belief in mass-murderer Saladdin as a moderate Muslim
- Egypt as a strong Coptic Christian nation with a Jewish minority that was converted to Islam by force
- Joseph François Michaud’s 6-volume false history of the Crusades and his imperialist agenda
- How Muslims changed their view of the Crusades from great Islamic victories into a false story of poor victims of evil Christian aggression
- Just War Doctrine that allows Christians to defend themselves against the onslaught of Islamic warriors
- Why today’s Christians should be proud of their Crusader forefathers’ defense of their religious beliefs
Watch
and learn:
http://www.realcatholictv.com/free/index.php?vidID=ciax-2011-09-23&ssnID=162
Catholic Investigative Agency
Real Catholic TV
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)