Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Liberal Double Standards


As Ann Coulter says, 
funny, isn't it, how liberals want everything they disapprove of banned (smoking, guns, practicing Christianity, ROTC, the Pledge of Allegiance)
and
whatever they approve of (abortion-on- demand, gay marriage, pornography, condom distribution in public schools, screenings of An Inconvenient Truth) made mandatory.


Order to Marines: No Farting


Can you believe this?  The Marine Corps Times reported that Marines in Afghanistan are not only forbidden to curse and to discuss sensitive topics like religion and politics, but they may no longer FART.  Loud flatulence has been prohibited for Marines downrange because it "offends" the sensitive Afghans, the same Afghans who wipe their ass with their hand..

Are you kidding me?!  There must be lawyers or State Dept pukes behind this complete nonsense.  If I was a gunney or officer out there in the 7th century backcountry, I would countermand that order and tell my men if they have to fart, then let 'er rip and do it with alacrity and panache.  Do like Ben Franklin said, FART PROUDLY!

Muslim Culture meets German Engineering



Ollie Ockbar!!

Great Ad on side of building in Berlin


This was done on the side of a building in Berlin, Germany, not on a movie screen in a theater. 

Seems Google and LG wish to outdo Apple in the world of slick advertising...
 

  http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=XVTga6GmbGw&vq=medium#t=74

 


Amazing video


Done like you've never seen before.

This video from the small Yupiq Eskimo Village of Quinhagak, Alaska , was a school computer project intended for the other Yupiq villages in the area.

Much to the villagers' shock, over a half million people have viewed it.

For your turn to view, Click: HERE


Murder with a twist

A true and bizarre tale ..

For those who have served on jury... This one is something to think
about... Just when you think you have heard everything!!

Do you like to read a good murder mystery? Not even Law and Order would
attempt to capture this mess. This is an unbelievable twist of fate!!!!

At the 1994 annual awards dinner given for Forensic Science, (AAFS)
President Dr. Don Harper Mills astounded his audience with the legal
complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story:

On March 23, 1994....... The medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald
Opus, and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr.
Opus had jumped from the top of a ten-story building intending to commit
suicide.. He left a note to the effect indicating his despondency. As he
fell past the ninth floor, his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast
passing through a window, which killed him instantly. Neither the shooter
nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been installed just
below the eighth floor level to protect some building workers and that
Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide the way he
had planned.

The room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was
occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously and
he was threatening her with a shotgun! The man was so upset that when he
pulled the trigger, he completely missed his wife, and the pellets went
through the window, striking Mr. Opus. When one intends to kill subject
'A' but kills subject 'B' in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of
subject 'B.' When confronted with the murder charge, the old man and his
wife were both adamant, and both said that they thought the shotgun was
not loaded. The old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his
wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no in tention to murder her.
Therefore the killing of Mr.Opus appeared to be an accident; that is,
assuming the gun had been accidentally loaded..

The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple's
son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident..

It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial support
and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun
threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would
shoot his mother.

Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the
murder even though he didn't actually pull the trigger. The case now
becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald
Opus.

Now comes the exquisite twist. Further investigation revealed that the
son was, in fact, Ronald Opus. He had become increasingly despondent over
the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother's murder. This led him
to jump off the ten-story building on March 23rd, only to be killed by a
shotgun   bl ast passing through the ninth story window.


The son, Ronald Opus, had actually murdered himself. So the medical
examiner closed the case as a suicide.

A true story from Associated Press

Monday, October 31, 2011

Let's stop playing the blame game.


    After reading Jack Van Ens’ column “A fiscal diet for Wall Street’s fat cats” which was published in the October 21 Denver Post YourHub, I had to write a few words in response.  Van Ens presents the leftist view of the causes of the current economic disaster and lays the blame on Wall Street and the so called wealthy 1%.   Van Ens echoes the progressive belief that the current economic down turn is all the fault of greedy bankers and Wall Street.   Van Ens engages in the blame game.  We love to blame “The Man.”  In this case the popular target is Big Business and the rich.   This attack upon big business and the wealthy of our country is not new. The same thing happened during The Great Depression by blaming Wall Street which is exactly what Van Ens proceeds to do in his article. 
    Van Ens starts out by blasting Herman Cain and Mitt Romney for their comments about the economy, and he says that they need a refresher course on U. S. financial history.   However, Jack also shows a lack of understanding when he proceeds to blame Big Business for “playing a leading role” in the Great Depression and claims that President Roosevelt’s Big Government came to the rescue and cleansed the temple of these “unscrupulous money changers” who get the blame for that economic collapse.  
    The progressive political viewpoints of Keynesians such as Jack greatly color their analysis of historic events that occurred eight decades ago.  The Keynesian versus Monetarists debate continue as to whether the Great Depression was primarily a failure on the part of free markets or a failure of government efforts to regulate interest rates, curtail widespread bank failures, and control the money supply. Those who believe in Big Government believe that it was primarily a failure of free markets, while those who believe in a smaller role for the state believe that it was primarily a failure of government that compounded the problem.   The Monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation, causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression.   Monetarists, including Frederick Hayek, Milton Friedman, and Ben Bernanke argued that the Great Depression was mainly caused by monetary contraction, the consequence of poor policy-making by the Federal Reserve System and continued crisis in the banking system.
    As the Depression wore on, Franklin D. Roosevelt tried public works, farm subsidies, and other Keynesian devices to restart the US economy.  According to the Keynesians, this improved the economy, but the Monetarists will tell you that Roosevelt’s action prolonged the suffering by throwing money into Big Government stimulus programs that failed and did not bring the economy out of recession for 10 years.  Most historians and economists partly blame the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 for worsening the depression by seriously reducing international trade and causing retaliatory tariffs in other countries.
    The current debate about our economy is playing out very similarly.  My Keynesian friends tell me that the ongoing decline of the private sector has absolutely nothing to do with the $14 trillion federal debt and the $1.5 trillion annual deficit.  In his article, Van Ens claims the Wall Street “money changers” are the villains.  Progressives such as Van Ens believe that the wealthy skated scot-free from the meltdown, benefited from the bailouts, and are primarily responsible for the loss of jobs, and that government has nothing to do with it.  But that belief presupposes that Wall Street and Big Government are somehow natural antagonists, which is certainly not true.  Recent Republican and Democrat administrations were and are full of Wall Street veterans.   
    Van Ens says that Big Government needs to “cleanse Manhattan’s concrete canyons of rotten financial deals.”   However, our current problems can be traced to the history of crony capitalism during recent president’s administrations.   As Denver talk radio host Mike Rosen says in one of his Denver Post columns, “It's not surprising that leftists, who worship at the shrine of big government, ignore the foundational role of government in this fiasco. If they laid the blame at the feet of their savior, it would contradict their blind faith in statism.”   Big Government is an equal partner is this economic destruction as is clearly evident in the rotten financial deals such as Solyndra, Fannie Mae, and auto company bailouts.
    Congressman Paul Ryan gets to the heart of the problem when he says we should stop this Big Government and Big Business collusion and "lower the amount of government spending the wealthy now receive." The "true sources of inequity in this country," he says, are "corporate welfare that enriches the powerful, and empty promises that betray the powerless."  The real class warfare that threatens us is "a class of bureaucrats and connected crony capitalists trying to rise above the rest of us, call the shots, rig the rules, and preserve their place atop society."
   As Denver Post columnist Vincent Carroll says, “the political left needs a bogeyman to buttress the thesis that growing income inequality is destroying the middle class and requires higher taxes on the rich to rectify the trend.”   If we are not careful, we will fall to the progressive politicians’ rhetoric and do the same thing this time as was done during the Great Depression. 
        Let’s remember that banks and their Wall Street investors didn’t force millions of Americans against their wills to sign loan agreements.  While there were some predator lenders the vast majority were simply following the rules and regulations set by our government.  If you bought a house you cannot afford you are the one truly at fault.  No one forced anyone to sign a loan they did not want.  
    Let’s stop blaming Big Business.    Sure there is greed on Wall Street. No one in America is promised riches or wealth or even a free meal.    It is time we all stopped looking for a rich Bogeyman to blame   Lets remember that when big business thrives so does the common worker. Big business is not the problem; it is the solution. The way out of this crisis is to stimulate business giving them incentives and advantages that help them not hinder them. Part of the auto industries problems lies in all the regulations Washington has placed upon them. Big business creates jobs that last. While we should never simply let businesses run rampart we should do all that we can to allow them to flourish. Doing so will then indeed cause our economy to turn around. Big business is not the enemy of the working class but its friend.  Let’s encourage Big Business to get bigger, make more people rich, and rich people to get richer. While giving executives of failed corporations large bonuses is outrageous, that is not what got us into this recession.  It might make for good fodder for the politicians, but it does not give us a solution for our present recession. Let’s stop playing the blame game and work for true solutions to more quickly recover from this recession.
    Let’s stop blaming the wealthy.  Rich people buy stuff regular people make and sell thus spreading the wealth.   Remember the Luxury tax a few years back? The thinking went that rich people should pay more taxes so let’s tax luxury items like yachts. Taxing the rich, who can afford more taxes would alleviate the tax burden of the common man and thus give him relief. What happened was the price of yachts went up and people stopped buying yachts due to the tax. As a result, middle class workers who made yachts got laid off.  The very tax that was suppose to help the common man turned around and took his job. That tax was quickly repealed and rich people went back to buying large ticket items that in turn keep regular people employed.
    An influential public speaker, Reverend William J. H. Boetcker, said in 1916 (in a quotation often misattributed to Abraham Lincoln), “You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer. You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.”  Let’s stop playing the blame game, and let’s stop the excessive government spending and crony capitalism.