Wednesday, August 29, 2012
ACORN Convert--very good videos
Very powerful and
enlightening!!!! WOW!! Be sure you have time and quiet to hear
every word!!
Take a listen to someone who was
on inside, and is now speaking out.....Any wonder why OBAMA continues to trash
AMERICA!
|
Take
a few minutes and listen to both videos very informative.
|
A MUST WATCH!!! Both parts!
Is anyone shocked the main stream media gave this woman no play?
|
This is what we've been hoping for.....that somebody would come
out of the woodwork & start telling the truth.
If they don’t use this lady at the
convention someone should be shot.......
The networks will have to show her speech no matter what. The
truth can be very powerful…
Play both parts…
|
In God We Trust
Fort Bragg, North Carolina
OBAMA STOPS SOLDIER FROM SPEAKING
Something
you'll want to be aware of:
Sent
by Retired Vice Admiral Bob Scarborough, of Arlington , VA.
"I
wanted to give you all some disturbing information on our wonderful president.
I work with the Catch-A-Dream Foundation, which provides hunting and fishing
trips to children with life-threatening illnesses. This past weekend we had our
annual banquet/fundraiser event in Starkville .
As
a part of our program, we had scheduled Sgt. 1st Class Greg Stube to come;
he's a highly decorated U.S. Army Green Beret and inspirational speaker who was
severely injured while deployed overseas and didn't have much of a chance for
survival.
Greg
is
stationed at Ft. Bragg , NC and received permission from his commanding officer to come speak at our function. Everything was on go until Obama made a policy that NO U.S. SERVICEMAN CAN SPEAK AT ANY FAITH-BASED PUBLIC EVENTS ANYMORE.
stationed at Ft. Bragg , NC and received permission from his commanding officer to come speak at our function. Everything was on go until Obama made a policy that NO U.S. SERVICEMAN CAN SPEAK AT ANY FAITH-BASED PUBLIC EVENTS ANYMORE.
Needless
to say, Greg had to cancel his speaking event with us. Didn't know if anyone
else was aware of this new policy. You're just starting to see the Obamanation.
This is just how the Nazis did it in the 1930's -- slowly, one step at a time.
This
should be forwarded to everyone regardless of party affiliation! We have
lost 50% of our freedom of speech in the last 2 years.
The
news media is not allowed to print anything negative about this evil Obama.
ARE
YOU STILL GOING TO REELECT HIM???????????
--
Robert D. Sinacola
COL (Ret), AVN, USAR
--
Robert D. Sinacola
COL (Ret), AVN, USAR
Mexico is angry
Wow! And make certain you read, at the bottom of this
page, the part that says it will take 30 more seconds to read!!! This is
what needs to be done, in my opinion! Please forward to all you
know and ask them to forward to all they know. Maybe, together, we
can make this happen!
The shoe is on the other foot and the Mexicans from the State of Sonora , Mexico do not like it. Can you believe the nerve of these people? It's almost funny. The State of Sonora is angry at the influx of Mexicans into Mexico !!!
Nine state legislators from the Mexican State of Sonora traveled to Tucson to complain about Arizona 's new employer crackdown on illegals from Mexico . It seems that many Mexican illegals are returning to their hometowns and the officials in the Sonora state government are ticked off. A delegation of nine state legislators from Sonora was in Tucson on Tuesday to state that Arizona 's new 'Employer Sanctions Law' will have a devastating effect on the Mexican state. At a news conference, the legislators said that Sonora, - Arizona's southern neighbor - made up of mostly small towns - can not handle the demand for housing, jobs and schools that it will face as Mexican workers return to their hometowns from the USA without jobs or money.
The Arizona law, which took effect Jan. 1, punishes Arizona employers who knowingly hire individuals without valid legal documents to work in the United States . Penalties include suspension of, or loss of, their business license. The Mexican legislators are angry because their own citizens are returning to their hometowns, placing a burden on THEIR state government.
'How can Arizona pass a law like this?' asked Mexican Rep Leticia Amparano-Gamez, who represents Nogales . 'There is not one person living in Sonora who does not have a friend or relative working in Arizona ,' she said, speaking in Spanish. 'Mexico is not prepared for this, for the tremendous problems it will face as more and more Mexicans working in Arizona and who were sending money to their families return to their hometowns in Sonora without jobs,' she said 'We are one family, socially and economically,' she said of the people of Sonora and Arizona .
Wrong! The United States is a sovereign nation, not a subsidiary of Mexico , and its taxpayers are not responsible for the welfare of Mexico 's citizens. It's time for the Mexican government, and its citizens, to stop feeding parasitically off the United States and to start taking care of its/their own needs.
Too bad that other states within the USA don't pass a law just like that passed by Arizona . Maybe that's the answer, since our own Congress will do nothing!
***New Immigration Laws***
Be sure to read to the bottom or you will miss the message...
1. There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
2. All ballots will be in this nation's language.
3. All government business will be conducted in our language.
4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.
5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office.
6. Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, or other government assistance programs. Any burden will be deported.
7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
8. If foreigners come here and buy land... options will be restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
9. Foreigners may have NO protests; NO demonstrations, NO waving of a foreign flag, no political organizing, NO bad-mouthing our president or his policies. These will lead to deportation.
10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively hunted and, when caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged. All assets will be taken from you.
Too strict?
The above laws are current immigration laws of MEXICO !
This will take less than thirty seconds to read. If you agree, please pass it on. An idea whose time has come: Somehow, that doesn't seem logical. We do not have an elite that is above the law. The self-serving must stop. This is a good way to do that. It is an idea whose time has come. Have each person contact a minimum of twenty people on their address list, in turn ask each of those to do likewise.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will have read the message. This is one proposal that really should be passed around.
***Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution***
"Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to all members of Congress, Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to all members of Congress, Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States.
You are one of my 20.
If you don't have twenty, pass it on to whatever number you can!
Government Gone Wild - Bloated Salaries
Guess we all chose the wrong profession!
This is a good one to watch no
matter which side you favor.
Not Democrat or Republican.
HOLD ON TO YOUR HATS; THIS VIDEO IS
UNBELIEVABLE.
This 3 minute 40 second video clip may
be
the most important clip you have ever
watched.
This is probably the most intelligent
presentation
of the truth you have seen in a long
time.
Please take the time to view this clip
and then share it with others!
Unbelievable Big
Government salaries.
Saturday, August 4, 2012
Intolerant Secularism Replacing Liberalism
Strengthen The Things That Remain
By Francis J. Beckwith
|
Boston
mayor Thomas Menino, for
instance, said, “Chick-fil-A doesn’t belong in Boston. You can’t have a
business in the city of Boston that discriminates against a population. We’re
an open city, we’re a city that’s at the forefront of inclusion.” Well, in that
case, the mayor’s office should be shut down, since while doing the business of
city government it seems intent on discriminating against devout Christians and
their businesses based on the degree to which their devotion offends secular
sensibilities.
What
I believe is happening here is something of a revolution in thinking. As
I have noted elsewhere in this space, what many of us have come to know as
liberalism was contrived for the very purpose of adjudicating these sorts of
disputes. One citizen, for example, may believe that homosexual conduct is morally
benign, and thus he comes to the conclusion that same-sex “marriage” should be
recognized by the government. Another citizen, however, may believe that
homosexual conduct is deeply immoral, since it is inconsistent with not only
what Scripture teaches but also with the deliverances of natural law. He,
therefore, concludes that same-sex “marriage” makes about as much sense as
“square-circle.”
In
either case, the citizen cannot simply “unbelieve” his beliefs by an act of
will, since they are organically connected to what he believes about human
nature, morality, and the common good. These beliefs are, in a sense,
fundamental to the citizen’s identity as a person. He can no more pretend his
beliefs are false than he can deny that the sky is blue.
Liberalism,
as traditionally understood, recognized and respected this reality. It did so
because its advocates believed that in a free society people of good will,
equally rational and well informed, are bound to come to radically different
conclusions on a variety of issues. For this reason, it allowed for a public
space in which citizens and the institutions they form, with their differing
and sometimes contrary points of view, can co-exist, without fear of government
punishments or reprisals. Things, however, seem to have changed.
Perhaps
it is because on the issue at hand – same-sex “marriage” – liberalism is
conceptually incapable of doing the work it once did. It is one thing to allow
and celebrate moral and religious diversity when there is a broadly shared
understanding on what sorts of institutions are vital to the common good and
civil society. It is quite another when that shared understanding breaks down –
when the very question of what is essential to civil society is itself in
dispute.
Consequently,
in such a milieu, as I believe we find ourselves, appeals to “civility” – as
both sides are apt to advance – cannot have a referent, and thus appear to
one’s adversaries as nothing more than a self-serving platitude.
Liberalism
has been all but defeated in certain enclaves. What has arisen is a secular
hegemony, one whose sincere devotees, like their pre-Enlightenment theocratic
predecessors, will not tolerate dissent. Thus, we do well to heed what St. John
wrote to the angel of the Church of Sardis, “Be watchful and strengthen the
things that remain.” (Rev.
3:3)
Francis
J. Beckwith is
Professor of Philosophy and Church-State Studies, Baylor University. He is
co-editor (with Robert P. George and Susan McWilliams) of the forthcoming A Second Look at
First Things: A Case for Conservative Politics, a festschrift in honor
of Hadley Arkes.
Are Christians not part of Chicago's Values?
Chicago
Cardinal Francis George has stepped in the ring on Chick-fil-A’s gay marriage
controversy in a blog post, criticizing Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s statement that the
fast food chain’s values “are not Chicago values.”
“Recent comments by those who administer our city seem to assume that the city government can decide for everyone what are the ‘values’ that must be held by citizens of Chicago,” George wrote on the Archdiocese of Chicago's blog Sunday. “I was born and raised here, and my understanding of being a Chicagoan never included submitting my value system to the government for approval. Must those whose personal values do not conform to those of the government of the day move from the city?”
George went on to write: “Approval of state-sponsored homosexual unions has very quickly become a litmus test for bigotry. … Surely there must be a way to properly respect people who are gay or lesbian without using civil law to undermine the nature of marriage.”
“Recent comments by those who administer our city seem to assume that the city government can decide for everyone what are the ‘values’ that must be held by citizens of Chicago,” George wrote on the Archdiocese of Chicago's blog Sunday. “I was born and raised here, and my understanding of being a Chicagoan never included submitting my value system to the government for approval. Must those whose personal values do not conform to those of the government of the day move from the city?”
George went on to write: “Approval of state-sponsored homosexual unions has very quickly become a litmus test for bigotry. … Surely there must be a way to properly respect people who are gay or lesbian without using civil law to undermine the nature of marriage.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)