Sunday, September 4, 2011

Letter to the Editor - Does the Tea Party Need to Compromise?

Letter to the Editor - Denver Post - YourHub Arvada

I have a few questions for Jack Van Ens’ after reading his latest Your Voice column “Compromise isn’t caving in” where he criticizes the Tea Party and tells them to be more willing to compromise.

    Can Jack provide us with the column he wrote criticizing the Democrats for ram-rodding the Obamacare Health Plan through Congress?   I don’t recall Jack calling for compromise and telling us about the need for Democrats to work with the Republicans to “pursue what makes for peace and mutual understanding” (Romans 14:19).  Can Jack provide us with the column he wrote condemning Speaker of the House Pelosi for using bully tactics to lock Republicans out of committee meetings while rushing this bill through the abridged legislative process?  

    Jack accuses the Tea Party of using “gutter-talk” when rallying the troops by showing a movie clip.  Will Jack be writing a column soon condemning those Democrats who call the Tea Party members “terrorists?”

    Jack calls members of the Tea Party hoodlums who kill, maim, and bully to get their way.  Will Jack be writing a column condemning ACORN, SEIU, and other union thugs who invade bank president’s homes and assault Tea Party members holding peaceful rallies?

    Jack tells us that President Obama’s debt speech on July 25 reminded citizens how important compromise is for Congress to function.  Can Jack tell us how it is compromise when Senator Harry Reid shelves a bill passed by the House calling for “cut, cap, and balance” and refuses to even bring this bill to the floor for debate in the Senate?   
   
    Jack tells us that the Tea Party and conservatives spin their wheels moored on soft shoulders.  Can Jack explain to us how the Tea Party is spinning its wheels with its simple calls for fiscal responsibility, limited government, and free markets?

    Jack tells us that the Tea Party threatens to raze our “Republic’s house.”  Can Jack explain how calls to cut, cap, and balance a budget threatens our Republic?   Is Jack not concerned that our Republic is in peril from overspending beyond our means?   Doesn’t that threaten our Republic?   Can Jack tells us what the founding fathers would have to say about our accumulation of our massive debt?

    Jack tells us that “consensus works to loosen a log-jammed Congress” and demands that the Tea Party must compromise on its principles to allow the debt ceiling to be raised so the federal government can spend its way beyond the $14 trillion debt.  Will Jack’s next column call for the Senate and President Obama to compromise on their principles of tax and spend?   Can Jack tell us how the Senate and President Obama should compromise to get us on that “high middle road” he seeks?   Or does Jack’s call for compromise only apply to the Tea Party and conservatives?

On the Trail with Newt Gingrich

    I spent parts of last week hiking on the Big Dry Creek Trail in Westminster with Newt Gingrich and his wife, Calista.  Actually, I was taking my daily walks on the trail while listening to Newt’s latest audio book: A Nation Like No Other: Why American Exceptionalism Matters.  As I walked parts of the trail over several days, I carried Newt in my pocket iPod and listened as he told me that he wants to help reawaken the country to the "exceptionalism" of the United States and make a case for why it should be embraced and fought for in this crucial period of our history. 

    As you know, Newt was the Speaker of the House, and he is a historian with a Ph.D. who is running for President.   However, Newt’s book is not about himself or why he is running for president.   It is about our Founding Founders, and it is not overtly political except as it relates to our history and Constitution, Bill of Rights, and creating a new kind of nation that is a hybrid between a Republic and a Democracy.  With some verbal assistance from Calista, Newt narrated a clear, concise understanding of American history, conveying the message that if we are to chart a better future, we first must understand our past and how we arrived where we are now.

    As a means of introduction, Newt explained the historical foundations of the idea of American Exceptionalism.  He said that this concept of American Exceptionalism is not a matter of arbitrary patriotic pride. It is a matter of historical fact arising from the founding of our nation on the revolutionary principle that the people are not the servants of the government; the government is the servant of the people. That gave rise to the comprehensive protections for individual rights in American government, the democratic process of our government, and the culture of personal and economic freedom that prevails in America.

    Newt talked about the time in 2009 when President Obama was asked if he believed in American Exceptionalism, and Obama replied that he believed in American Exceptionalism the way that the British believe their country is exceptional and the Greeks believe their country is exceptional.  Newt was not happy with that multicultural view that all countries are exceptional in their own way and that all countries and cultures are equal.   Newt strongly believes that our American history and culture make us unique and exceptional compared to other countries.  Newt went on to explain how this American exceptionalism is at the root of America's history of prosperity and the American Dream that still serves as a beacon to the world, drawing hundreds of millions to our shores. 

      In his book, Newt discussed the threats to American exceptionalism and the continued viability of the American Dream and our heritage of world leading prosperity. He discussed what needs to be done to restore that world leading prosperity and to assure the American Dream is passed down to our children and grandchildren. 

    As we walked along the trail, Newt presented his book to me in three parts.

    Part I ("Remembering Who We Are") contained three chapters that explore the history of where American Exceptionalism came from.  Newt described to me our nation's early history and the lessons learned from its failed exercises in utopianism and communalism and how the colonies thrived when they turned to self-reliance and liberty.  Newt examined the thinkers, including Locke, who profoundly influenced our nation's Founders.  Newt used the words of the Founders themselves.  Both public statements and private correspondences were referenced to bolster his arguments.

    A key event described by Newt is at the historic Bowling Green site in New York City when the Continental Army assembled to hear a reading of the newly printed Declaration of Independence.  That had to be quite an event.  The troops were so inspired on hearing the words that they proceeded to tear down the statue of King George III at that location and used the metal to fashion bullets to use against the 30,000 troops the British had just disembarked on Staten Island. This army from Britain was roughly equal to the entire population of Manhattan at the time. The Colonists seemed to have no chance against such might, training, and provisions. Yet, despite loss, privation, and seeming hopelessness the Colonists persisted and after eight hard years they prevailed. I found that to be very informative and educational.  This historical background showed why it made no sense for President Obama to say in 2009 that he believes in American Exceptionalim just as the Greeks believe in Greek Excpetionalism and the British believe in British Exceptionalism.   We are in deed an exceptional country with a remarkable history.

    It was hot on the trail, but I continued on in anticipation as Newt moved on to Part II ("Defining American Exceptionalism") where he presented his key argument on the five “Habits of Liberty” that constitute American Exceptionalism.  They are: Faith and Society, Work, Civil Society, Rule of Law, and Safety and Peace.  Newt talked to me about each of these Habits of Liberty in turn. Each chapter in this section of the book not only described what it is and illustrated the tradition in history, but showed how the Progressive agenda for the past century has worked against each one. By weakening each of these aspects of the American character, progressive policies aimed to turn us into another version of the European democratic socialist welfare state.  Newt discussed why we must resist these trends and what we will lose if we let these habits die away from us.  Newt had my complete attention, and even the beautiful view of our Colorado mountains couldn’t distract me from Newt’s narrative.

    As we dodged prairie dogs on the trail, Newt narrated Part III ("America Rising") where he took me through the problems the welfare state is facing and the dangers it continues to pose to America as a nation and to the future we will leave our children and grandchildren.  Newt gave me "Ten Steps to Restoring American Exceptionalism."   The theme is that it is up to each of us. Winning elections with the right people is important, but not nearly enough.   We need to fight back in our daily lives.  The Progressive politics of the last century have slowly taken over schools, entertainment, and the broad culture as well as politics.  Nest exhorted me to learn the real history of America, to speak out, to constantly question government authority, to teach fellow citizens and even children to insist that our schools teach personal responsibility and true American citizenship.  He also said that we need to get bad judges off the bench, to re-enshrine work as part of everyone's principles of life, to make a big deal out of our American Holidays, to become active volunteers in our communities, and even to run for one of the more than half-million elected offices in our country.

    I thought the best part of Newt’s book was Chapter 10 which provides current stories of every-day people who are making a difference by pushing back against the pervasive government that is ignoring our Constitution and even our laws to implement its own agenda.  Newt calls these "the Bowling Greens in our backyards." 

    Newt concluded our walk by providing a vision way into the future on January 20, 2021 when a new Conservative President is elected following eight years of a President and a Congress committed to American Exceptionalism and restoring our founding principles.

    If Newt really had been on the trail with me, I would have told him that I found his book inspiring and informative. I would tell him that I will encourage others to take the time to read it, think about it, and discuss it with their friends.  2012 will be a vital election year, and we have to be active, vocal, and get those committed to our American Heritage energized and working for these principles.

    In short, A Nation Like No Other: Why American Exceptionalism Matters is a great read and audio book. It is incredibly fast-paced, provides the necessary facts to logically back up Newt’s arguments and it provides a plan to every American on how to keep the United States the most exceptional country in the world.

On the Trail with Governor Rick Perry

    I spent several hours last week hiking on the Big Dry Creek Trail in Westminster with Texas Governor Rick Perry.   Actually, I listened to his book, Fed Up!: Our Fight to Save America from Washington, on my iPod.  If he had actually gone hiking with me, I think he would tell me to call him Rick; so I will as I tell you what he told me via his audio book.
  
  I didn’t know that he has served as governor for 11 years-longer than any other in Texas history; and before being elected he served in the Texas legislature, as the Texas Agricultural Commissioner, and as lieutenant governor.   Rick has been in the leadership of the Republican Governor's Association for five years and is an Eagle Scout.  By the way he wrote a previous book about his admiration of the Boy Scouts and what they stand for.  But I digress.  After he graduated from Texas A&M, he became an Air Force pilot flying C-130s and attained the rank of captain. He is a candidate to be the Republican presidential nominee in 2012, but he wrote this book in 2010 and says that he had no desire at that time to run for president.

    Fed Up: Our Fight to Save America from Washington is not really a book about Rick Perry. It's a book about Rick Perry's ideas. And his biggest idea is that many things the federal government does are unconstitutional.    Rick’s book is a serious argument about what kind of country we should be and is not another vanity memoir by a national political figure.  He just wants to make a powerful case for a return to limited government and the restoration of the proper balance of power between Washington and the states.  

    I enjoyed the book’s Introduction where he kept asking if I was fed up with being over-taxed and over-regulated.  He wanted to know if I was tired of being told how much salt to put on my food, what kind of cars I can drive, what kinds of guns I can own, what kind of prayers I am  allowed to say and where I can say them, what I am allowed to do to elect political candidates, what kind of energy I can use, and which doctor I can see.   He asked “what kind of nation are we becoming?”   We both agreed that we are fed up because deep down we know how great America has always been, how many great things the people do in spite of their government, and how great the nation can be in the future if the overbearing federal government will just back off on micro-managing and instead focus on its main mission of defending our country and providing our national security.        

    Those questions got me energized to hear more from him about his ideas and what needs to be done to restore federalism. Rick said that our fight is clear. We must step up and retake the reins of our government from a Washington establishment that has abused our trust.  We must empower states to fight for our beliefs, elect only leaders who are on our team, set out to remind our fellow Americans why liberty is guaranteed in the Constitution, and take concrete steps to take back our country.  Rick reminded me that the American people have never sat idle when liberty's trumpet sounds the call to battle-and today that battle is for the soul of America.

    I found the most interesting part of Rick's book to be the chapter "Why States Matter," which argues for states as the laboratories of policy innovation. Even liberal advocates of homosexual marriage or legalized marijuana would agree that if California or Massachusetts want to enact state laws on those issues, they should be entitled to, and not be prevented by the overreaching feds. Rick is intellectually honest enough to support that, as he would support conservative-friendly laws that may differ from what other states do. The whole idea is to get away from a federal nanny state that decides these things for us with a national template. That's not what our federal union is all about, and in Fed Up!: Our Fight to Save America from Washington, Rick lays it out with force and economy.  I liked when he said that you should live in California if you favor gay marriage and legalization of drugs while you should be move to Texas if you want to carry a weapon to defend yourself and be able to shoot a menacing coyote as he has done.  So, I had no fears of coyote attacks while hiking with Rick!

    I think Rick captures the mood of today. Americans are fed up with the federal government's overreach into our lives, and this book has several short-term, concrete solutions, as well as a long-term vision for how to get our country back on the path to freedom and prosperity. Rick would return power to the states and let them be those laboratories of innovation. He suggests a "balanced budget" amendment or a "spending limit" amendment to keep our politicians from breaking the bank and driving us ever deeper into debt. He calls for a ban on pork barrel earmarks. He suggests limiting the number of days Congress is in session, and moving toward a biennial budgeting cycle as they do in Texas.   He surprised me by saying that he wants to repeal the 16th Amendment, which allows for a personal income tax.   I liked that!

    Rick bases many of his recommended solutions on the Texas success story. In Texas, the legislature meets for only 140 days, every two years, and it is one of a handful of states without a state income tax. Texas is also where 4 out of 5 private sector jobs has been created in America since 2005.  Lots of research shows that states without income taxes (like Texas) perform better than states with income taxes, economically-speaking.   Rick even touches the third rail of politics, Social Security, and calls it a Ponzi scheme.  He offers some solutions to fix that insolvent program that is about to run off the rails.

    Rick has been called a protege and puppet of George W. Bush, but he cites several ways in which he has disagreed with the former president.  As Rick puts it, "this big-government binge began under the administration of George W. Bush."  I was actually surprised with how critical Rick is of Mr. Bush and other Republicans. Rick criticizes some Bush-supported actions such as the seizure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in September 2008, along with the Troubled Asset Relief Program signed into law in October 2008, as "the culmination of the statist's dream -- the literal upending of a unique American way of doing things that had been defined by self-reliance, hard work, faith, a belief in private charity not government, and, perhaps most of all, a devotion to free markets."

    Rick also takes three separate swipes at the universal health care plan begun by one of his 2012 rivals, Mitt Romney.  Rick says that since it was passed, "the waiting times to see a doctor in Massachusetts have nearly doubled," while "the costs are so out of control" that a commission has already recommended rationing care.   Even Newt Gingrich, another 2012 rival, who wrote the foreword to Rick's book, is not spared. Rick writes that "most" of the "spending restraint" during the Gingrich-led Congress "came from not fighting President Clinton's efforts to cut military spending."

    Overall, the book is an argument for enforcing the Tenth Amendment, limiting federal government, and relying more on the states.  He makes the case that more of the decisions in our country should be made in state capitals or by private individuals rather than in Washington.   I think that a lot of what's in this book will shape the debate for elections in 2012.

    Anyway, Rick concluded his book and our trail walk with a section entitled, "Taking Back America" in which he advocates for the following: repealing Obamacare; states reasserting their Constitutional authority; sustaining a dialogue about limited, Constitutional government; electing and holding accountable Constitutionally-minded leaders; and making structural reforms.  Rick calls for: restricting federal spending with a spending limit amendment; restricting federal revenue by replacing the income tax with a national sales tax or a "Fair Tax"; and, restricting what has become the "unlimited power of the courts to rule over us with no accountability."

    Rick headed back to Texas and left me with lots to think about as I hit the trail this week.


Coffee with a Progressive - Should Tea Party Activists Heed History?


    It’s going to be another hot August day, but I’m enjoying the view of Long’s Peak while I drink my morning coffee.  Aren’t we lucky to live here in Colorado?  Oh, I see that the Denver Post has arrived with the YourHub community supplement which means I’ll probably be having a virtual coffee klatch with my leftist neighbor in Arvada, Jack Van Ens.  I see he has written another article about those Tea Party hooligans, “Tea Party activists should heed history.”   Looks like I will be spilling my coffee and talking to Jack as if he is here with me.  
  
  Jack, do you truly believe that the Tea Party is calling for a return to the Articles of Confederation? 

    Do you believe that our founding fathers wanted the federal government to be the sole legislative body of the United States?  Wouldn’t they be very unhappy that the federal government has taken over the health care industry, the banking industry, the car industry and the housing industry?   

    Jack, do you believe that once the federal government seeks new roles without its having been so mandated by the people it has overstepped its bounds?  Is the notion of a bloated federal government with powers far beyond those enumerated in our Constitution perfectly reasonable?  Do you think that the government should be allowed to force people to sell their property to another private individual or group if the government deems it important? (See Kelo v. City of New London)  Is there no limit to federal government power and nothing government can't justify with a little warping of the Commerce Clause?

    What would George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams and the rest of our founding fathers think of today’s federal government?   Would they not say that our freedom and liberties are being slowly taken away from us?  Would they not believe that our federal government is entrenching on our individual liberties?   

    Do you agree with Benjamin Franklin who stated, “The larger the government, the smaller the peoples liberties.”?

    Don’t you agree with Thomas Jefferson’s statement,” I am for a government rigorously frugal and simply applying all the possible savings of the public revenue to the discharge of the national debt and not for a multiplications of offices and salaries merely to make partisan.”?

    Jack, do you agree with Thomas Jefferson who said, “I place economy among the first and most important of republican virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers to be feared. We must make our choice between frugality and liberty, or excessive spending and servitude. If the debt should be swelled to a formidable size, its entire discharge will be despaired of and we shall be committed to a career of debt corruption, and rottenness. The discharge of the debt, therefore, is vital to the destiny of our government.”?

    How about Thomas Paine’s statement, “The preservation of a free Government requires not merely, that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained; but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great Barrier which defends the rights of the people. The Rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment, exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are Tyrants. The People who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them, and are slaves.”

    If the founding fathers were around today, wouldn’t they be in total shock by the amount of money that our federal government is spending?  Wouldn’t doing away with the huge debt be their highest priority?    Isn’t it safe to say that our founding father would not just sit by today and watch as their nation spins down the drain of financial ruin?  Wouldn’t our founding fathers be Tea Party activists calling for fiscal responsibility, limited government, and free markets?

    Jack, you must stop reading those Huffington Post blogs, and stop watching MSNBC for crying out loud!   What are they putting in the water over there in Arvada?.    

Coffee with a Leftist - Is Michele Bachmann a Demon?

            It’s Thursday which means that my Denver Post YourHub supplement has arrived.  I see there is another article from Jack Van Ens.  My blood pressure rises as I read his comments.  If Jack was having coffee with me this morning, I think that I would have to tell him the following.

          Thanks, Jack, for your YourHub article, “Michele Bachmann’s dangerous distortion,” where you point out US Representative Bachmann’s “blatant error of how the Constitution’s shapers regarded slavery . . .”   I’m glad that you pointed out to us how she has blasphemed against the Bible (1 Timothy 4:7) with her comments.  I’m grateful that you told us of this great atrocity committed by this evil Tea Party conservative. 

    Jack, you tell me that Bachmann “dupes voters,” “manipulate’s the electorate’s emotions,”  and “looks them in the eye, speaks with a stirring command of the English language.”  That sounds like she must be casting a spell over those country bumpkins known as conservatives.   It’s good that you are warning me to be suspicious of the likes of Bachmann and Sarah Palin whom you called a “phony populist.” Jack, you’ve convinced me that they must be witches intent on bringing back slavery and bringing our country to a terrible fate such as having a $14 trillion debt!   The horror!     

   I think that some people would call you a misogynist who fears strong women, and some people might say that you are trying to demonize those who have viewpoints that differ from your own.  But, I’m glad that you are sounding the alarm about these evil, horrid, tea-drinking women.     

     I know that some people would be more worried about blatant errors from US Representative Nancy Pelosi when she said, “ Every month that we don’t have an economic recovery package, 500 million Americans lose their job.”   Some people would claim they were duped by Nancy Pelosi for declaring that unemployment benefits “injects demand into the economy.”   And other people would be suspicious when Nancy Pelosi said, “But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”   But we have nothing to fear from such a saintly progressive.   It is those wicked women on the right who must be demons or at least be demonized. 

Gentle Thoughts for Today

Birds of a feather flock together . . . .and then sh*t on your car.

A penny saved is a government oversight.

The older you get, the tougher it is to lose weight, because by then your body and your fat have gotten to be really good friends.

The easiest way to find something lost around the house is to buy a replacement.

He who hesitates is probably right.

Did you ever notice: The Roman Numerals for forty (40) are XL.
If you can smile when things go wrong, you have someone in mind to blame.

The sole purpose of a child's middle name is so he can tell when he's really in trouble..

Did you ever notice: When you put the 2 words 'The' and 'IRS' together it spells 'Theirs...'

Aging: Eventually you will reach a point when you stop lying about your age and start bragging about it.

Some people try to turn back their odometers. Not me, I want people to know 'why' I look this way. I've traveled a long way and some of the roads weren't paved.

When you are dissatisfied and would like to go back to your youth, think of Algebra.

You know you are getting old when everything either dries up or leaks.

One of the many things no one tells you about aging is that it is such a nice change from being young. Ah, being young is beautiful, but being old is comfortable.

Lord, Keep your arm around my shoulder and your hand over my mouth . . .. . . . .
AMEN!

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Economic crisis warnings that were ignored.

    This video clearly shows that George Bush warned Congress starting in 2001, that this economic crisis was coming if something was not done.  But Congress refused to Listen, along with the arrogant Congressman, Barney Frank. This video says it all. The liberal media reportedly did not want this video on You Tube; it was taken off. This link is of the same video, but is routed through Canada.
    Everyone in America needs to see this before it is yanked off the Internet again!
    Let's see how far we can spread it before it's pulled off the Canadian site.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&NR=1